1 September 2009
I got the most amazing rejection letter yesterday. It actually made me feel good. I will copy it here so everyone can read it:
Dear Elizabeth,
I enjoyed reading these pages of Syncopation. You’ve chosen a good subject: a recognizable name who hasn’t been overdone and who has an intriguing back story. There’s also some beautiful writing here. I love the opening piece about the pulse of the universe. You’re also trying some more unconventional devices with the names and the back-and-forth between time periods/narration. I’m not sure these are entirely successful, but I may not be the best judge. I tend to prefer more straightforward narrative. The unconventional elements make this more appropriate for a more literary list than mine.
I’ve enjoyed seeing your work. I wish you the best of luck in finding a home for it.
Sincerely,
[Editor’s name withheld]
Isn’t that a great rejection? Makes me feel so literary and hopeful!
Elizabeth Caulfield Felt 
It’s always nice to hear encouraging words from rejection letters. It’s doubly nice this wasn’t a form rejection. The editor took the time to write something thoughtful. Was this a reply to a full submission? Usually those yield the best critiques.
I think it’s smart, too, to withhold the name of the person who sent it.
Totally unrelated here, but I have a suggestion. I had a hard time finding your e-mail address. I know it’s on the About page, but I’d suggest making it more prominent, in case an agent or editor is skimming for a contact.
wow, the rejection almost seems like an afterthought.